Last night, I attended Eric King
Watts' lecture regarding Zombie Media and the Extreme Preparedness
Culture. Before I dive into my
experience, I must state that I was deeply ashamed of some of the audience. It all began
with two interruptions within the first fifteen minutes of his talk. The first interruption was to “dim the
lights”, but rather than simply dim the lights a loud proclamation was made
which stopped the entire presentation. The second interruption was to run the
nightly computer tune up which thankfully was completed a little more quietly.
However, Watts was still required to stop his presentation to allow for this
interruption. Following these
interruptions, members of the audience proceeded to talk, roll their eyes,
openly text on their cell phones, and leave in the middle of the talk. Please note that it was not just a few
students who left early. Once the
questions began LARGE amounts of individuals left. When leaving the presentation ALL of the reception snacks
were eaten (besides some fruit) before the reception even began. I do not know if this was from audience
members who left early or students within the atrium. Overall, I was
embarrassed. Now that my rant is over, let’s focus on the talk itself.
Eric Watts’ talk was a refreshing
and an intellectually stimulating conversation that correlated perfectly with
our Comm 322. There were two key
aspects of his lecture that I noticed in regards to the content of our
class. First, his use of
rhetorical analysis on a text was clear.
Watts’ was clear in providing the entirety of the rhetorical situation
surrounding the Discovery Channel Docudrama. He provided the historical backing of the text, a
description of all key parts of the text including the rhetors, and the
implications of the text’s message.
Second, he demonstrated an effective way to make an argument about a
text and show the “so what”. Watts
would frequently use “I argue” signposts to signify his arguments and he would
consistently use textual evidence to back those arguments. He also provided textual evidence, as
well as historical, to support his “so what” of his argument. He explained that we are all in a
process of “zombification” and that it is crucial that we do not allow Extreme
Preparedness to remove the humanity from our lives. He emphasized that we do not want our first response to
“zombies” to be to shoot them in the head.
I do believe that Watts’
presentation given in our class was stronger than the lecture given last
night. I got the impression that
he was much more comfortable with the material presented in class than the
Extreme Preparedness focus. I was
given this impression because he was much more animated in our class, rarely
used his notes, and moved around the room. In Watts’ lecture last night, he frequently read from his
notes and rarely moved from the podium.
However, my favorite part of his lecture last night was when he did
move. Watts’ became very animated
when he discussed the relationship between the system of Affective Apparatus
and The Symbolic. I believe this
was one of the strongest aspects of his lecture last night. He used perfect hand gestures, spoke
from memory, and came across confident.
Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed Watts’ presentation last night and in
class.
No comments:
Post a Comment