I found the Wii shall overcome
article very interesting and think that some McGonigal’s points had some true
merit. I believe it would be
exciting to incorporate gaming into helping others. However, when McGonigal discussed how we are evolving, it
reminded me of board games. Board
games are like video games in that you can compete, form alliances, and enhance
skills such as reading, strategy, problem solving, and math. Online video games allow you to reach
individuals all across the world while board games only let you access those
that are in the room with you. While
it is important to cooperate and communicate with individuals all across the
world, I think the interaction within board games amongst people all in the
same room is potentially more important.
I
do believe there is potential for online video games to make a large impact on
the world in some way. But I would
hope that in-person games would not be lost. Board games allow individuals to communicate and compete
against people that they are already bonded too. This bond can then be strengthened through playing board
games. How powerful would it be
for two friends to help alleviate the “world’s ills” who have bonded in person
rather than an interpersonal act of helping others through video games. I wonder if online video games would separate
people from their action of helping others. The act of helping would just be a extra benefit to playing the game, rather than the sole purpose. I think that it might be more powerful to have a bonded
group of individuals, through board games, working to help the world rather
than through online video games.
No comments:
Post a Comment